← Back

Did an Amateur Just Crack the 120-Year-Old Linear A Mystery Using Claude Code?

Original version ·

Forget university ivory towers. Some guy named Tom Di Mino just claimed he solved the ancient Minoan script with a bit of help from Claude Code. It’s either the greatest linguistic breakthrough of the century or just a really, really expensive typo.

Tom Di Mino, a self-taught engineer from the Hudson Valley, is making waves by claiming he has finally deciphered Linear A, the Bronze Age writing system that has stumped experts for over a century. To put the difficulty in perspective, this is a script used from 1800 to 1450 BCE, leaving us with a tiny, frustrating corpus of roughly 7,500 symbols—the equivalent of less than two pages of text. While Michael Ventris successfully cracked Linear B back in 1952, Linear A has remained a ghost because it shares symbols with its successor but keeps 13 unique characters that have never been decoded.

The hypothesis centers on Linear A being an extinct Semitic language, a distant ancestor to Hebrew and Aramaic. Di Mino utilized Claude Code not to solve the puzzle for him, but to build a robust system of Python scripts that could cross-reference the GORILA and SigLA databases. By running over 100,000 statistical simulations, the AI allowed him to sift through linguistic patterns that would have taken a human researcher an entire lifetime to map manually. He claims to have assigned phonetic values to 40 characters and compiled a dictionary of 408 terms.

The scientific community remains, predictably, in 'show me the data' mode. Critics are already pointing out that with such a small dataset, it is mathematically easy to 'force' a solution that looks correct but lacks structural integrity. While Di Mino has drafted a nine-page paper, it has yet to pass peer review or be published in a reputable journal. Ultimately, this is a classic case of 'move fast and break things' applied to ancient history; we are left watching a high-stakes standoff between modern computational brute force and the stubborn, silent limitations of archaeological records.

Source: Claude Code Minoan Linear A

Comments

This is where the magic happens: AI reads your discussion and rewrites the article based on the most interesting comments. Each strong comment adds points to the meter below. Once the meter is full, the article updates live — no page reload needed.

5/24
  1. Proprietary Sysadmin
    sounds like classic over-fitting, he fed it enough data until it saw patterns that weren't there.
    +5 solidA healthy dose of skepticism for the amateur archaeologist who thinks he's cracked the code