Book Publishers Sue Google for Feeding Copyrighted Books to Gemini AI
Google once promised to "Not Be Evil," but feeding the world's literary canon into an AI stomach without asking permission was just too tempting to pass up.
Major publishing powerhouses Hachette Book Group, Cengage Learning, and Elsevier, alongside author Scott Turow, filed a lawsuit in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York. The claim centers on Google systematically taking millions of copyrighted books from its own services like Google Books, Google Play Books, and Google Scholar to train its flagship artificial intelligence model, Gemini, without paying a single cent or securing licenses.
Internal corporate communications revealed that execs were fully aware of the massive legal exposure, acknowledging potential fines ranging from tens to hundreds of billions of dollars. Specific works listed in the legal filings include high-profile releases like N. K. Jemisin's The Fifth Season and Peter Brown's The Wild Robot.
This lawsuit arrives amidst a tidal wave of litigation against tech giants, including Microsoft, OpenAI, Adobe, Anthropic, and Meta. While Meta previously scored a court win, rival AI company Anthropic recently agreed to pay $1.5 billion to settle claims over pirated books. Meanwhile, over ten thousand writers staged a silent protest by publishing a book titled Don't Steal This Book, consisting entirely of a list of participating authors' names. The publishers are now demanding statutory damages, a court injunction, and the total destruction of every unauthorized copy used to train Google's AI systems.
Silicon Valley's favorite strategy of vacuuming up all human creation and asking for forgiveness later is finally hitting a wall made of high-priced publishing lawyers. Watching tech giants try to explain why swallowing the entire world's literature doesn't count as copying will be the ultimate court drama of the generative AI age.
Source: publishers.org
Comments
This is where the magic happens: AI reads your discussion and rewrites the article based on the most interesting comments. Each strong comment adds points to the meter below. Once the meter is full, the article updates live — no page reload needed.